Product / user research methodology. Select the right method for the goal (generative vs evaluative vs validation), compute method-based saturation /. Slash command for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI.
Copy the command definition below into:
~/.claude/commands/cs-product-research-alirezarezvani.md---
title: "/cs-product-research — Slash Command for AI Coding Agents"
description: "Product / user research methodology. Select the right method for the goal (generative vs evaluative vs validation), compute method-based saturation /. Slash command for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI."
---
# /cs-product-research
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-console: Slash Command</span>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/2-claude-skills/tree/main/research-ops/commands/cs-product-research.md">Source</a></span>
</div>
Run the `product-research` skill on this input:
**$ARGUMENTS**
## Three-tool workflow
1. **`study_designer.py`** — Map (research goal × product stage) to an appropriate method and emit a plan skeleton (objective, participant criteria, guide structure, success criteria). Redirects live A/B to `product-team/experiment-designer`.
2. **`saturation_planner.py`** — Method-based sample guidance with an explicit confidence label: Nielsen problem-discovery (5/segment), Guest et al. thematic saturation (~12), evaluative coverage. Never claims a prevalence rate from a small-n usability test.
3. **`insight_synthesizer.py`** — Cluster coded observations by tag, count distinct participants, rank by cross-participant recurrence, and flag any candidate below the source threshold as an ANECDOTE — never promoting it to an insight.
## Output
- Recommended method + plan skeleton (matched to the goal)
- Sample / saturation plan with confidence + limits
- Synthesized candidates: INSIGHT vs ANECDOTE with evidence
- Top 3 next actions
## Hard rule
**Method must match the goal, and an insight requires recurrence across independent participants.** A single quote is an anecdote, not a finding.
## First run + optimization
- **Onboard first:** `python3 skills/product-research/scripts/onboard.py` (product profile, insight source-threshold, saturation method, high-stakes flag) — saved config pre-configures every tool. `--show` lists the questions.
- **Optimize (opt-in):** only if the user asks to optimize the synthesis/run a loop, hand off to autoresearch via `skills/product-research/scripts/ar_evaluator.py` (`validated_insights`, higher is better).
## Distinct from
- `product-team/ux-researcher-designer` — that produces personas/journey artifacts. This is method + repository discipline.
- `product-team/product-discovery` — that plans discovery sprints. This designs and synthesizes the research.
- `product-team/experiment-designer` — that runs live A/B. This runs qualitative/evaluative research.
- `market-research` (sibling) — that studies the market. This studies users.