Spatial and temporal convergence analysis with Richardson extrapolation and Grid Convergence Index (GCI) for solution verification
Install with the open skills CLI (global, non-interactive — available in every Claude Code session):
npx skills add FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills --skill "convergence-study" -g -a claude-code -yOr manually — clone and copy the skill directory (SKILL.md + companion files):
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills /tmp/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills && cp -r /tmp/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills/skills/convergence-study ~/.claude/skills/convergence-studyThis skill is a directory: SKILL.md is the entry point; the files below ship with it.
---
name: convergence-study
description: Spatial and temporal convergence analysis with Richardson extrapolation and Grid Convergence Index (GCI) for solution verification
allowed-tools:
- Bash
- Read
---
# Convergence Study
## Goal
Provide script-driven convergence analysis for verifying that numerical solutions converge at the expected rate as the mesh or timestep is refined.
## Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- NumPy (not required; scripts use only math stdlib)
## Inputs to Gather
| Input | Description | Example |
|-------|-------------|---------|
| Grid spacings | Sequence of mesh sizes (coarse to fine) | `0.4,0.2,0.1,0.05` |
| Timestep sizes | Sequence of dt values | `0.04,0.02,0.01` |
| Solution values | QoI at each refinement level | `1.16,1.04,1.01,1.0025` |
| Expected order | Formal order of the numerical scheme | `2.0` |
| Safety factor | GCI safety factor (1.25 default) | `1.25` |
## Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Key Outputs |
|--------|-------------|
| `scripts/h_refinement.py` | `results.observed_orders`, `results.mean_order`, `results.richardson_extrapolated_value`, `results.convergence_assessment` |
| `scripts/dt_refinement.py` | Same as h_refinement but for temporal convergence |
| `scripts/richardson_extrapolation.py` | `results.extrapolated_value`, `results.error_estimate`, `results.observed_order` |
| `scripts/gci_calculator.py` | `results.observed_order`, `results.gci_fine`, `results.gci_coarse`, `results.asymptotic_ratio`, `results.in_asymptotic_range` |
## Workflow
1. **Run grid/timestep refinement study** with at least 3 levels
2. **Compute observed convergence order** with `h_refinement.py` or `dt_refinement.py`
3. **Compare** observed order to expected order of the scheme
4. **Estimate discretization error** via Richardson extrapolation
5. **Report GCI** for formal solution verification using `gci_calculator.py`
6. **Document** convergence results and any anomalies
## Decision Guidance
```
Do you have 3+ refinement levels?
+-- YES --> Run h_refinement.py or dt_refinement.py
| +-- Observed order matches expected? --> Solution verified
| +-- Order too low? --> Check: pre-asymptotic, coding error, insufficient resolution
| +-- Order too high? --> Check: superconvergence or cancellation effects
+-- NO (only 2 levels) --> Use richardson_extrapolation.py with assumed order
(less reliable without order verification)
```
## CLI Examples
```bash
# Spatial convergence with 4 grid levels
python3 scripts/h_refinement.py --spacings 0.4,0.2,0.1,0.05 --values 1.16,1.04,1.01,1.0025 --expected-order 2.0 --json
# Temporal convergence with 3 timestep levels
python3 scripts/dt_refinement.py --timesteps 0.04,0.02,0.01 --values 2.12,2.03,2.0075 --expected-order 2.0 --json
# Richardson extrapolation with assumed 2nd-order
python3 scripts/richardson_extrapolation.py --spacings 0.02,0.01 --values 1.0032,1.0008 --order 2.0 --json
# GCI for 3-mesh verification
python3 scripts/gci_calculator.py --spacings 0.04,0.02,0.01 --values 1.0128,1.0032,1.0008 --json
```
## Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|-------|-------|------------|
| `spacings and values must have the same length` | Mismatched input arrays | Provide equal-length lists |
| `At least 2 refinement levels required` | Too few data points | Add more refinement levels |
| `Exactly 3 refinement levels required` | GCI needs 3 levels | Provide fine/medium/coarse |
| `Oscillatory convergence detected` | Non-monotone convergence | Check mesh quality or scheme |
## Interpretation Guidance
| Scenario | Meaning | Action |
|----------|---------|--------|
| Observed order matches expected | Solution in asymptotic range | Report GCI, extrapolate |
| Observed order < expected | Pre-asymptotic or coding bug | Refine further or debug |
| Negative observed order | Solution diverging | Check implementation |
| GCI asymptotic ratio near 1.0 | Grids in asymptotic range | Results are reliable |
| GCI asymptotic ratio far from 1.0 | Not in asymptotic range | Refine further |
## References
- `references/convergence_theory.md` - Formal convergence order, log-log analysis, asymptotic range
- `references/gci_guidelines.md` - Roache's GCI method, ASME V&V 20, safety factors
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code