Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
Install with the open skills CLI (global, non-interactive — available in every Claude Code session):
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill "crafting-effective-readmes" -g -a claude-code -yOr manually — clone and copy the skill directory (SKILL.md + companion files):
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates /tmp/claude-code-templates && cp -r /tmp/claude-code-templates/cli-tool/components/skills/productivity/crafting-effective-readmes ~/.claude/skills/crafting-effective-readmes-davila7This skill is a directory: SKILL.md is the entry point; the files below ship with it.
---
name: crafting-effective-readmes
description: Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
---
# Crafting Effective READMEs
## Overview
READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.
**Always ask:** Who will read this, and what do they need to know?
## Process
### Step 1: Identify the Task
**Ask:** "What README task are you working on?"
| Task | When |
|------|------|
| **Creating** | New project, no README yet |
| **Adding** | Need to document something new |
| **Updating** | Capabilities changed, content is stale |
| **Reviewing** | Checking if README is still accurate |
### Step 2: Task-Specific Questions
**Creating initial README:**
1. What type of project? (see Project Types below)
2. What problem does this solve in one sentence?
3. What's the quickest path to "it works"?
4. Anything notable to highlight?
**Adding a section:**
1. What needs documenting?
2. Where should it go in the existing structure?
3. Who needs this info most?
**Updating existing content:**
1. What changed?
2. Read current README, identify stale sections
3. Propose specific edits
**Reviewing/refreshing:**
1. Read current README
2. Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
3. Flag outdated sections
4. Update "Last reviewed" date if present
### Step 3: Always Ask
After drafting, ask: **"Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"**
## Project Types
| Type | Audience | Key Sections | Template |
|------|----------|--------------|----------|
| **Open Source** | Contributors, users worldwide | Install, Usage, Contributing, License | `templates/oss.md` |
| **Personal** | Future you, portfolio viewers | What it does, Tech stack, Learnings | `templates/personal.md` |
| **Internal** | Teammates, new hires | Setup, Architecture, Runbooks | `templates/internal.md` |
| **Config** | Future you (confused) | What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas | `templates/xdg-config.md` |
**Ask the user** if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.
## Essential Sections (All Types)
Every README needs at minimum:
1. **Name** - Self-explanatory title
2. **Description** - What + why in 1-2 sentences
3. **Usage** - How to use it (examples help)
## References
- `section-checklist.md` - Which sections to include by project type
- `style-guide.md` - Common README mistakes and prose guidance
- `using-references.md` - Guide to deeper reference materials
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session