Validate simulations before, during, and after execution. Use for pre-flight checks, runtime monitoring, post-run validation, diagnosing failed simulations, checking convergence, detecting NaN/Inf, or verifying mass/energy conservation.
Install with the open skills CLI (global, non-interactive — available in every Claude Code session):
npx skills add FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills --skill "simulation-validator" -g -a claude-code -yOr manually — clone and copy the skill directory (SKILL.md + companion files):
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills /tmp/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills && cp -r /tmp/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills/skills/simulation-validator ~/.claude/skills/simulation-validatorThis skill is a directory: SKILL.md is the entry point; the files below ship with it.
---
name: simulation-validator
description: Validate simulations before, during, and after execution. Use for pre-flight checks, runtime monitoring, post-run validation, diagnosing failed simulations, checking convergence, detecting NaN/Inf, or verifying mass/energy conservation.
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Write, Grep, Glob
---
# Simulation Validator
## Goal
Provide a three-stage validation protocol: pre-flight checks, runtime monitoring, and post-flight validation for materials simulations.
## Requirements
- Python 3.8+
- No external dependencies (uses Python standard library only)
- Works on Linux, macOS, and Windows
## Inputs to Gather
Before running validation scripts, collect from the user:
| Input | Description | Example |
|-------|-------------|---------|
| Config file | Simulation configuration (JSON/YAML) | `simulation.json` |
| Log file | Runtime output log | `simulation.log` |
| Metrics file | Post-run metrics (JSON) | `results.json` |
| Required params | Parameters that must exist | `dt,dx,kappa` |
| Valid ranges | Parameter bounds | `dt:1e-6:1e-2` |
## Decision Guidance
### When to Run Each Stage
```
Is simulation about to start?
├── YES → Run Stage 1: preflight_checker.py
│ └── BLOCK status? → Fix issues, do NOT run simulation
│ └── WARN status? → Review warnings, document if accepted
│ └── PASS status? → Proceed to run simulation
│
Is simulation running?
├── YES → Run Stage 2: runtime_monitor.py (periodically)
│ └── Alerts? → Consider stopping, check parameters
│
Has simulation finished?
├── YES → Run Stage 3: result_validator.py
│ └── Failed checks? → Do NOT use results
│ → Run failure_diagnoser.py
│ └── All passed? → Results are valid
```
### Choosing Validation Thresholds
| Metric | Conservative | Standard | Relaxed |
|--------|--------------|----------|---------|
| Mass tolerance | 1e-6 | 1e-3 | 1e-2 |
| Residual growth | 2x | 10x | 100x |
| dt reduction | 10x | 100x | 1000x |
## Script Outputs (JSON Fields)
| Script | Output Fields |
|--------|---------------|
| `scripts/preflight_checker.py` | `report.status`, `report.blockers`, `report.warnings` |
| `scripts/runtime_monitor.py` | `alerts`, `residual_stats`, `dt_stats` |
| `scripts/result_validator.py` | `checks`, `confidence_score`, `failed_checks` |
| `scripts/failure_diagnoser.py` | `probable_causes`, `recommended_fixes` |
## Three-Stage Validation Protocol
### Stage 1: Pre-flight (Before Simulation)
1. Run `scripts/preflight_checker.py --config simulation.json`
2. **BLOCK status**: Stop immediately, fix all blocker issues
3. **WARN status**: Review warnings, document accepted risks
4. **PASS status**: Proceed to simulation
```bash
python3 scripts/preflight_checker.py \
--config simulation.json \
--required dt,dx,kappa \
--ranges "dt:1e-6:1e-2,dx:1e-4:1e-1" \
--min-free-gb 1.0 \
--json
```
### Stage 2: Runtime (During Simulation)
1. Run `scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.log` periodically
2. Configure alert thresholds based on problem type
3. Stop simulation if critical alerts appear
```bash
python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py \
--log simulation.log \
--residual-growth 10.0 \
--dt-drop 100.0 \
--json
```
### Stage 3: Post-flight (After Simulation)
1. Run `scripts/result_validator.py --metrics results.json`
2. **All checks PASS**: Results are valid for analysis
3. **Any check FAIL**: Do NOT use results, diagnose failure
```bash
python3 scripts/result_validator.py \
--metrics results.json \
--bound-min 0.0 \
--bound-max 1.0 \
--mass-tol 1e-3 \
--json
```
### Failure Diagnosis
When validation fails:
```bash
python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json
```
## Conversational Workflow Example
**User**: My phase field simulation crashed after 1000 steps. Can you help me figure out why?
**Agent workflow**:
1. First, check the log for obvious errors:
```bash
python3 scripts/failure_diagnoser.py --log simulation.log --json
```
2. If diagnosis suggests numerical blow-up, check runtime stats:
```bash
python3 scripts/runtime_monitor.py --log simulation.log --json
```
3. Recommend fixes based on findings:
- If residual grew rapidly → reduce time step
- If dt collapsed → check stability conditions
- If NaN detected → check initial conditions
## Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Resolution |
|-------|-------|------------|
| `Config not found` | File path invalid | Verify config path exists |
| `Non-numeric value` | Parameter is not a number | Fix config file format |
| `out of range` | Parameter outside bounds | Adjust parameter or bounds |
| `Output directory not writable` | Permission issue | Check directory permissions |
| `Insufficient disk space` | Disk nearly full | Free up space or reduce output |
## Interpretation Guidance
### Status Meanings
| Status | Meaning | Action |
|--------|---------|--------|
| PASS | All checks passed | Proceed with confidence |
| WARN | Non-critical issues found | Review and document |
| BLOCK | Critical issues found | Must fix before proceeding |
### Confidence Score Interpretation
| Score | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| 1.0 | All validation checks passed |
| 0.75+ | Most checks passed, minor issues |
| 0.5-0.75 | Significant issues, review carefully |
| < 0.5 | Major problems, do not trust results |
### Common Failure Patterns
| Pattern in Log | Likely Cause | Recommended Fix |
|----------------|--------------|-----------------|
| NaN, Inf, overflow | Numerical instability | Reduce dt, increase damping |
| max iterations, did not converge | Solver failure | Tune preconditioner, tolerances |
| out of memory | Memory exhaustion | Reduce mesh, enable out-of-core |
| dt reduced | Adaptive stepping triggered | May be okay if controlled |
## Limitations
- **Not a real-time monitor**: Scripts analyze logs after-the-fact
- **Regex-based**: Log parsing depends on pattern matching; may miss unusual formats
- **No automatic fixes**: Scripts diagnose but don't modify simulations
## References
- `references/validation_protocol.md` - Detailed checklist and criteria
- `references/log_patterns.md` - Common failure signatures and regex patterns
## Version History
- **v1.1.0** (2024-12-24): Enhanced documentation, decision guidance, Windows compatibility
- **v1.0.0**: Initial release with 4 validation scripts
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code